Friday, January 20, 2006

When Dippers Become Beamers

75 % of all driving public in Mumbai are pathetically inept at the practicality of driving. That figure is just a measure of my experience on the roads. Oncoming traffic shouldnt be a hindrance, naturally cuz its not in our lane.

A high or full beam is all it takes to create a substantial flashbang effect. Atrocious. I can't accept such fundamental errors. Agreed, our driving schools dont provide the best pedagogues and the loopholes used to attain licenses at early ages are also abundant. But some common sense is to be expected during execution of various parameters involved while driving right ?

And when u flash back in a pulsating manner in a desperate attempt to let the guy know how insanely blinding the light can be.. he replies with a horn. Most of the times he'll ingore the request.

How I'd like to sock em in someday.

3 comments:

VJ the PsychO said...

yo dudely...

man but i am kind of psycho, when it comes to this they have to face a psychic sawying car with high beam right in their faces untill they turn off there beamers...

this is wrong, but the right doesnt seem to effect these high beamers...

anywayz a question... what is the difference between blinkers and flashers

Love you longtime! said...

Yes, the 'courtesy-while-driving' factor is alsmost absent here. I rmemebr, when once I banged my car into other's and damn... I didn't have a license on me! ;)

The flashy lights can be pain just like unnnescary honking is!

JC said...

yup dude...
Me too got the liscence with jhool n without test...
These high beamers are pain in the ass even for the people who are crossing the roads...

I hav never banged into someone, but caught very juvenile by "RTO officers"

So,the basic problem lies in issuing the liscence's without traffic rules test n the practical test...

Do something Mumbai Police...

ENJOy...
-JC